n-grammi in pitone, quattro, cinque, sei grammi?

Sto cercando un modo per dividere un testo in n-grammi. Normalmente farei qualcosa del tipo:

import nltk
from nltk import bigrams
string = "I really like python, it's pretty awesome."
string_bigrams = bigrams(string)
print string_bigrams

Sono consapevole che nltk offre solo bigrammi e trigrammi, ma c'è un modo per dividere il mio testo in quattro grammi, cinque grammi o persino cento grammi?

Grazie!

Grandi risposte basate su Python native fornite da altri utenti. Ma ecco l' nltkapproccio (per ogni evenienza, l'OP viene penalizzato per aver reinventato ciò che già esiste nella nltkbiblioteca).

C'è un modulo ngram che le persone usano raramente nltk. Non è perché è difficile leggere gli ngram, ma allenare un modello di base su ngram dove n> 3 comporterà molta scarsità di dati.

from nltk import ngrams

sentence = 'this is a foo bar sentences and i want to ngramize it'

n = 6
sixgrams = ngrams(sentence.split(), n)

for grams in sixgrams:
  print grams

Sono sorpreso che questo non sia ancora apparso:

In [34]: sentence = "I really like python, it's pretty awesome.".split()

In [35]: N = 4

In [36]: grams = [sentence[i:i+N] for i in xrange(len(sentence)-N+1)]

In [37]: for gram in grams: print gram
['I', 'really', 'like', 'python,']
['really', 'like', 'python,', "it's"]
['like', 'python,', "it's", 'pretty']
['python,', "it's", 'pretty', 'awesome.']

Utilizzando solo strumenti nltk

from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize
from nltk.util import ngrams

def get_ngrams(text, n ):
    n_grams = ngrams(word_tokenize(text), n)
    return [ ' '.join(grams) for grams in n_grams]

Esempio di output

get_ngrams('This is the simplest text i could think of', 3 )

['This is the', 'is the simplest', 'the simplest text', 'simplest text i', 'text i could', 'i could think', 'could think of']

Per mantenere gli ngram in formato array basta rimuoverli ' '.join

ecco un altro modo semplice per fare n-grammi

>>> from nltk.util import ngrams
>>> text = "I am aware that nltk only offers bigrams and trigrams, but is there a way to split my text in four-grams, five-grams or even hundred-grams"
>>> tokenize = nltk.word_tokenize(text)
>>> tokenize
['I', 'am', 'aware', 'that', 'nltk', 'only', 'offers', 'bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams', ',', 'but', 'is', 'there', 'a', 'way', 'to', 'split', 'my', 'text', 'in', 'four-grams', ',', 'five-grams', 'or', 'even', 'hundred-grams']
>>> bigrams = ngrams(tokenize,2)
>>> bigrams
[('I', 'am'), ('am', 'aware'), ('aware', 'that'), ('that', 'nltk'), ('nltk', 'only'), ('only', 'offers'), ('offers', 'bigrams'), ('bigrams', 'and'), ('and', 'trigrams'), ('trigrams', ','), (',', 'but'), ('but', 'is'), ('is', 'there'), ('there', 'a'), ('a', 'way'), ('way', 'to'), ('to', 'split'), ('split', 'my'), ('my', 'text'), ('text', 'in'), ('in', 'four-grams'), ('four-grams', ','), (',', 'five-grams'), ('five-grams', 'or'), ('or', 'even'), ('even', 'hundred-grams')]
>>> trigrams=ngrams(tokenize,3)
>>> trigrams
[('I', 'am', 'aware'), ('am', 'aware', 'that'), ('aware', 'that', 'nltk'), ('that', 'nltk', 'only'), ('nltk', 'only', 'offers'), ('only', 'offers', 'bigrams'), ('offers', 'bigrams', 'and'), ('bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams'), ('and', 'trigrams', ','), ('trigrams', ',', 'but'), (',', 'but', 'is'), ('but', 'is', 'there'), ('is', 'there', 'a'), ('there', 'a', 'way'), ('a', 'way', 'to'), ('way', 'to', 'split'), ('to', 'split', 'my'), ('split', 'my', 'text'), ('my', 'text', 'in'), ('text', 'in', 'four-grams'), ('in', 'four-grams', ','), ('four-grams', ',', 'five-grams'), (',', 'five-grams', 'or'), ('five-grams', 'or', 'even'), ('or', 'even', 'hundred-grams')]
>>> fourgrams=ngrams(tokenize,4)
>>> fourgrams
[('I', 'am', 'aware', 'that'), ('am', 'aware', 'that', 'nltk'), ('aware', 'that', 'nltk', 'only'), ('that', 'nltk', 'only', 'offers'), ('nltk', 'only', 'offers', 'bigrams'), ('only', 'offers', 'bigrams', 'and'), ('offers', 'bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams'), ('bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams', ','), ('and', 'trigrams', ',', 'but'), ('trigrams', ',', 'but', 'is'), (',', 'but', 'is', 'there'), ('but', 'is', 'there', 'a'), ('is', 'there', 'a', 'way'), ('there', 'a', 'way', 'to'), ('a', 'way', 'to', 'split'), ('way', 'to', 'split', 'my'), ('to', 'split', 'my', 'text'), ('split', 'my', 'text', 'in'), ('my', 'text', 'in', 'four-grams'), ('text', 'in', 'four-grams', ','), ('in', 'four-grams', ',', 'five-grams'), ('four-grams', ',', 'five-grams', 'or'), (',', 'five-grams', 'or', 'even'), ('five-grams', 'or', 'even', 'hundred-grams')]

Le persone hanno già risposto abbastanza bene per lo scenario in cui hai bisogno di bigrams o trigrammi ma se hai bisogno di everygram per la frase in quel caso puoi usarenltk.util.everygrams

>>> from nltk.util import everygrams

>>> message = "who let the dogs out"

>>> msg_split = message.split()

>>> list(everygrams(msg_split))
[('who',), ('let',), ('the',), ('dogs',), ('out',), ('who', 'let'), ('let', 'the'), ('the', 'dogs'), ('dogs', 'out'), ('who', 'let', 'the'), ('let', 'the', 'dogs'), ('the', 'dogs', 'out'), ('who', 'let', 'the', 'dogs'), ('let', 'the', 'dogs', 'out'), ('who', 'let', 'the', 'dogs', 'out')]

Nel caso abbiate un limite come nel caso di trigrammi in cui la lunghezza massima dovrebbe essere 3, allora potete usare max_len param per specificarlo.

>>> list(everygrams(msg_split, max_len=2))
[('who',), ('let',), ('the',), ('dogs',), ('out',), ('who', 'let'), ('let', 'the'), ('the', 'dogs'), ('dogs', 'out')]

Puoi semplicemente modificare il parametro max_len per ottenere qualsiasi grammo cioè quattro grammi, cinque grammi, sei o anche cento grammi.

Le soluzioni menzionate in precedenza possono essere modificate per implementare la soluzione sopra menzionata, ma questa soluzione è molto semplice.

Per ulteriori letture clicca qui

E quando hai solo bisogno di un grammo specifico come bigram o trigram ecc. Puoi usare i nltk.util.ngrams come menzionato nella risposta di MAHassan.

Puoi facilmente attivare la tua funzione per farlo usando itertools:

from itertools import izip, islice, tee
s = 'spam and eggs'
N = 3
trigrams = izip(*(islice(seq, index, None) for index, seq in enumerate(tee(s, N))))
list(trigrams)
# [('s', 'p', 'a'), ('p', 'a', 'm'), ('a', 'm', ' '),
# ('m', ' ', 'a'), (' ', 'a', 'n'), ('a', 'n', 'd'),
# ('n', 'd', ' '), ('d', ' ', 'e'), (' ', 'e', 'g'),
# ('e', 'g', 'g'), ('g', 'g', 's')]

Un approccio più elegante per costruire bigram con built-in di Python zip(). Converti semplicemente la stringa originale in un elenco split(), quindi passa l'elenco una volta normalmente e una volta spostato di un elemento.

string = "I really like python, it's pretty awesome."

def find_bigrams(s):
    input_list = s.split(" ")
    return zip(input_list, input_list[1:])

def find_ngrams(s, n):
  input_list = s.split(" ")
  return zip(*[input_list[i:] for i in range(n)])

find_bigrams(string)

[('I', 'really'), ('really', 'like'), ('like', 'python,'), ('python,', "it's"), ("it's", 'pretty'), ('pretty', 'awesome.')]

Non ho mai avuto a che fare con nltk ma ho fatto N-grammi come parte di un progetto di piccola classe. Se vuoi trovare la frequenza di tutti gli N-grammi presenti nella stringa, ecco un modo per farlo. Dti darebbe l'istogramma delle tue N-parole.

D = dict()
string = 'whatever string...'
strparts = string.split()
for i in range(len(strparts)-N): # N-grams
    try:
        D[tuple(strparts[i:i+N])] += 1
    except:
        D[tuple(strparts[i:i+N])] = 1

Per four_grams è già in NLTK , ecco un pezzo di codice che può aiutarti in questo:

 from nltk.collocations import *
 import nltk
 #You should tokenize your text
 text = "I do not like green eggs and ham, I do not like them Sam I am!"
 tokens = nltk.wordpunct_tokenize(text)
 fourgrams=nltk.collocations.QuadgramCollocationFinder.from_words(tokens)
 for fourgram, freq in fourgrams.ngram_fd.items():  
       print fourgram, freq

Spero possa essere d'aiuto.

Puoi usare sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer :

import sklearn.feature_extraction.text # FYI http://scikit-learn.org/stable/install.html
ngram_size = 4
string = ["I really like python, it's pretty awesome."]
vect = sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer(ngram_range=(ngram_size,ngram_size))
vect.fit(string)
print('{1}-grams: {0}'.format(vect.get_feature_names(), ngram_size))

uscite:

4-grams: [u'like python it pretty', u'python it pretty awesome', u'really like python it']

È possibile impostare ngram_sizesu qualsiasi numero intero positivo. Cioè puoi dividere un testo in quattro grammi, cinque grammi o persino cento grammi.

Se l'efficienza è un problema e devi costruire più n-grammi diversi (fino a cento come dici tu), ma vuoi usare il puro pitone farei:

from itertools import chain

def n_grams(seq, n=1):
    """Returns an itirator over the n-grams given a listTokens"""
    shiftToken = lambda i: (el for j,el in enumerate(seq) if j>=i)
    shiftedTokens = (shiftToken(i) for i in range(n))
    tupleNGrams = zip(*shiftedTokens)
    return tupleNGrams # if join in generator : (" ".join(i) for i in tupleNGrams)

def range_ngrams(listTokens, ngramRange=(1,2)):
    """Returns an itirator over all n-grams for n in range(ngramRange) given a listTokens."""
    return chain(*(n_grams(listTokens, i) for i in range(*ngramRange)))

Utilizzo:

>>> input_list = input_list = 'test the ngrams generator'.split()
>>> list(range_ngrams(input_list, ngramRange=(1,3)))
[('test',), ('the',), ('ngrams',), ('generator',), ('test', 'the'), ('the', 'ngrams'), ('ngrams', 'generator'), ('test', 'the', 'ngrams'), ('the', 'ngrams', 'generator')]

~ Stessa velocità di NLTK:

import nltk
%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=5)
# 7.02 ms ± 79 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
n_grams(input_list,n=5)
# 7.01 ms ± 103 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=1)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=2)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=3)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=4)
nltk.ngrams(input_list,n=5)
# 7.32 ms ± 241 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%%timeit
input_list = 'test the ngrams interator vs nltk '*10**6
range_ngrams(input_list, ngramRange=(1,6))
# 7.13 ms ± 165 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

Ripubblica dalla mia risposta precedente .

Nltk è fantastico, ma a volte è un sovraccarico per alcuni progetti:

import re
def tokenize(text, ngrams=1):
    text = re.sub(r'[\b\(\)\\\"\'\/\[\]\s+\,\.:\?;]', ' ', text)
    text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text)
    tokens = text.split()
    return [tuple(tokens[i:i+ngrams]) for i in xrange(len(tokens)-ngrams+1)]

Esempio di utilizzo:

>> text = "This is an example text"
>> tokenize(text, 2)
[('This', 'is'), ('is', 'an'), ('an', 'example'), ('example', 'text')]
>> tokenize(text, 3)
[('This', 'is', 'an'), ('is', 'an', 'example'), ('an', 'example', 'text')]

Puoi ottenere tutti i 4-6grammi usando il codice senza altri pacchetti qui sotto:

from itertools import chain

def get_m_2_ngrams(input_list, min, max):
    for s in chain(*[get_ngrams(input_list, k) for k in range(min, max+1)]):
        yield ' '.join(s)

def get_ngrams(input_list, n):
    return zip(*[input_list[i:] for i in range(n)])

if __name__ == '__main__':
    input_list = ['I', 'am', 'aware', 'that', 'nltk', 'only', 'offers', 'bigrams', 'and', 'trigrams', ',', 'but', 'is', 'there', 'a', 'way', 'to', 'split', 'my', 'text', 'in', 'four-grams', ',', 'five-grams', 'or', 'even', 'hundred-grams']
    for s in get_m_2_ngrams(input_list, 4, 6):
        print(s)

l'output è inferiore:

I am aware that
am aware that nltk
aware that nltk only
that nltk only offers
nltk only offers bigrams
only offers bigrams and
offers bigrams and trigrams
bigrams and trigrams ,
and trigrams , but
trigrams , but is
, but is there
but is there a
is there a way
there a way to
a way to split
way to split my
to split my text
split my text in
my text in four-grams
text in four-grams ,
in four-grams , five-grams
four-grams , five-grams or
, five-grams or even
five-grams or even hundred-grams
I am aware that nltk
am aware that nltk only
aware that nltk only offers
that nltk only offers bigrams
nltk only offers bigrams and
only offers bigrams and trigrams
offers bigrams and trigrams ,
bigrams and trigrams , but
and trigrams , but is
trigrams , but is there
, but is there a
but is there a way
is there a way to
there a way to split
a way to split my
way to split my text
to split my text in
split my text in four-grams
my text in four-grams ,
text in four-grams , five-grams
in four-grams , five-grams or
four-grams , five-grams or even
, five-grams or even hundred-grams
I am aware that nltk only
am aware that nltk only offers
aware that nltk only offers bigrams
that nltk only offers bigrams and
nltk only offers bigrams and trigrams
only offers bigrams and trigrams ,
offers bigrams and trigrams , but
bigrams and trigrams , but is
and trigrams , but is there
trigrams , but is there a
, but is there a way
but is there a way to
is there a way to split
there a way to split my
a way to split my text
way to split my text in
to split my text in four-grams
split my text in four-grams ,
my text in four-grams , five-grams
text in four-grams , five-grams or
in four-grams , five-grams or even
four-grams , five-grams or even hundred-grams

puoi trovare maggiori dettagli su questo blog

Dopo circa sette anni, ecco una risposta più elegante usando collections.deque:

def ngrams(words, n):
    d = collections.deque(maxlen=n)
    d.extend(words[:n])
    words = words[n:]
    for window, word in zip(itertools.cycle((d,)), words):
        print(' '.join(window))
        d.append(word)

words = ['I', 'am', 'become', 'death,', 'the', 'destroyer', 'of', 'worlds']

Produzione:

In [15]: ngrams(words, 3)                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
I am become
am become death,
become death, the
death, the destroyer
the destroyer of

In [16]: ngrams(words, 4)                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
I am become death,
am become death, the
become death, the destroyer
death, the destroyer of

In [17]: ngrams(words, 1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
I
am
become
death,
the
destroyer
of

In [18]: ngrams(words, 2)                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
I am
am become
become death,
death, the
the destroyer
destroyer of

Se desideri una soluzione iteratrice pura per stringhe di grandi dimensioni con utilizzo costante della memoria:

from typing import Iterable  
import itertools

def ngrams_iter(input: str, ngram_size: int, token_regex=r"[^\s]+") -> Iterable[str]:
    input_iters = [ 
        map(lambda m: m.group(0), re.finditer(token_regex, input)) 
        for n in range(ngram_size) 
    ]
    # Skip first words
    for n in range(1, ngram_size): list(map(next, input_iters[n:]))  

    output_iter = itertools.starmap( 
        lambda *args: " ".join(args),  
        zip(*input_iters) 
    ) 
    return output_iter

Test:

input = "If you want a pure iterator solution for large strings with constant memory usage"
list(ngrams_iter(input, 5))

Produzione:

['If you want a pure',
 'you want a pure iterator',
 'want a pure iterator solution',
 'a pure iterator solution for',
 'pure iterator solution for large',
 'iterator solution for large strings',
 'solution for large strings with',
 'for large strings with constant',
 'large strings with constant memory',
 'strings with constant memory usage']